Last November, Digia announced the start of the new project named Qt WebEngine. Based on Google Chromium, it is a drop-in replacement of Qt WebKit. Most of the people welcomed the project, as they can easily use Chromium and Blink to their own environment. Digia said that Qt WebEngine will be as compatible as possible against Qt WebKit, and everybody belived in the promise, as Digia had a good reputation against Nokia, as they were practically leading the project well even in Nokia days of Qt.
Last week, I read a new blog article from Qt WebEngine team, and I saw some “complaints” about APIs for the new module. I jumped to the wiki and found out that my beloved QWebElement, which is the most needed core feature for my web crawler engine, will be unavailable in Qt WebEngine - according to the wiki, due to multi-process nature of the Chromium the feature should be designed asynchronously, but the design of Qt WebEngine is synchronous, it is not supported anymore.
Not only QWebElement. It also doesn’t integrate QNetworkAccessManager, which is another thing I use to check sanity of the content. Qt WebEngine uses Chromium’s own network stack, meaning I cannot review any network action from the Engine.
Thanks to the changes, my product won’t be able to support some of the features it currently has. From the foreseeable future, Qt WebKit will survive until Qt 5.4, which is expected to be released at this September, but there’s no guarantee what’ll happen when Qt 5.5 open source edition is released.
Of course there are be some reasons beyond giviing up WebKit as it requires more manpower for maintenance and I respect their decision to manage their development team in “more efficient” way. Yet I’m afraid there will be more who’re frustrated against new Qt WebEngine for its limited features as I read from some replies for Qt WebEngine blog article last week.
Well, now I search for some alternative development environment. I was already searching for a replacement of Qt itself as I see it become feature-bloat, resulting in more complicated setup environment, slow startup time in QML(up to 10 seconds for showing blank window), as I adopt new version of the library. And Qt WebEngine accelerated my move. Currently I consider wxWidgets+wxWebConnect(or wxWebView) combination as a replacement for current development environment.
Anyway, Qt WebKit was a great project, yet seeing one of the greatest development projects fade out to the history is quite a pain. Especially if the fadeout directly hits me hard.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
블로그를 이전합니다
뭐, 이런 작은 변방의 블로그에 관심있으신 분들은 아무도 없으시리라 생각합니다만...... (웃음) 블로그 플랫폼을 블로거에서 dev.to로 옮겼습니다. 새 URL은 아래와 같습니다: https://dev.to/teminian 새로운 거처에서 뵙겠습니...
Popular in Code{nested}
-
Unlike libssh, which uses cmake, libssh2 forces you to use Linux-like environment even in Windows, which eventually makes you to install MSY...
-
Net-SNMP는 거의 모든 리눅스 배포본에서 표준 SNMP 관리자로 사용되고 있는, 사실상의 표준이라고 할 수 있는 범용적인 도구입니다. 이번에 기회가 있어서 SNMP Trap 메시지를 받아서 처리는 도구를 만들게 되었는데, 개발중 중요하다고 생각되...
-
2019년 6월 19일부로 Qt 5.13.0이 발표 되었습니다. Qt 5.13.0의 새로운 기능 중에서 제 눈길을 꽤 끈 신기능이 하나 있었는데요....... Qt for WebAssembly 입니다. 그러니까...... Emscripten 을 사용해...
No comments:
Post a Comment